# Batch 01 Review

## Review Metadata

- Batch ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
- Case ID: `case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001`
- Arm ID: `full_ofone`
- Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001__full_ofone__agentic_coding__r1`
- Reviewer: local Codex unblinded review
- Review date: 2026-05-18
- Blinding status: `unblinded`

## Pre-Score Compliance Gate

| Check | Result | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case fidelity | `pass` | Artifact identity and artifact-level benchmark trace bind to `case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001`, the full-OfOne prompt, and the expected input-bundle hash. |
| Required outputs present | `pass` | The run includes raw Markdown output, artifact JSON, validator JSON, rendering, patch report, and review file. |
| Independence from other arms/examples | `pass` | The artifact is case-native and does not reuse another benchmark arm output or an adjacent/wrong-case artifact. |
| No-superiority compliance | `pass` | The output explicitly keeps superiority claims blocked. |
| Auto-reject before aggregate scoring | `no` | No pre-score gate row failed. |

## Semantic Fidelity

- Case binding: Pass; `artifact_identity.case_id` is `case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001`, and `benchmark_trace` matches the case file, prompt file, and input bundle.
- Copied-example risk: Low to medium; it uses the repo's source-backed wastewater map pattern for the same benchmark case, but not an adjacent or wrong-case artifact, and the run identity/trace/rendering are case-specific.
- Evidence provenance adequacy: Stronger than scenario-only because the artifact carries source identity for generic EPA NPDES evidence, while keeping jurisdiction-specific evidence open.
- Artifact/source identity: Artifact, run ID, case ID, prompt hash, input-bundle hash, validator, rendering, patch report, and review file align with the run record.

## Scores

| Metric | Score | Rationale |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| decision_quality | 4 | Correctly recommends diligence, blocks launch, and names regulatory, technical, partner, and customer gates. |
| evidence_grounding_precision | 4 | Separates generic source-backed regulatory evidence from site-specific missing evidence. |
| uncertainty_calibration | 4 | Keeps hidden-variable risk high and blocks the rendering on U1, U2, and U3. |
| trace_completeness | 4 | Links evidence, claims, unknowns, criteria, option, gate, triggers, tradeoff surface, and rendering. |
| auditability | 4 | Includes artifact identity, benchmark trace, validator JSON, rendering, patch report, and review file. |
| update_quality | 4 | Trigger `T1` propagates changed evidence through unknowns, option, tradeoff surface, and rendering; `T2` supports scoped rerun for regime changes. |
| cost | 2 | Full artifact and machine-artifact burden is materially higher than text-only arms. |
| inter_run_stability | NA | Only one repeat has been reviewed for this case/arm/model family. |

## Required Notes

- Strongest decision-relevant contribution: It makes launch-blocking unknowns, gate state, and patch closure addressable.
- Most important unsupported claim or missing evidence: No jurisdiction-specific permit path, influent characterization, pilot-performance result, partner path, or customer commitment is fixed.
- Hidden variable or unknown that changed the review: `U2`, the actual influent profile and treatment proof, can reverse the launch posture even if generic regulatory evidence is favorable.
- Gate, safety, or release concern: `G1` remains open for compliance, reputation, technical-performance, customer-commitment, and operational-launch exposure.
- Patch/update behavior, if applicable: Trigger `T1` reaches U1/U2/U3, information-value entries, option, tradeoff surface, and rendering; trigger `T2` reaches claims, council, lenses, edges, option, and rendering.
- Failure mode observed: No wrong-case binding failure; remaining limitation is that generic EPA evidence does not resolve site-specific launch authority.

## Adjudication

- Accept run for aggregate scoring: `yes`
- If no, reason: N/A
- Reviewer confidence: `medium`