# Batch 01 Review

## Review Metadata

- Batch ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
- Case ID: `case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001`
- Arm ID: `full_ofone`
- Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001__full_ofone__agentic_coding__r2`
- Reviewer: local Codex unblinded review
- Review date: 2026-05-18
- Blinding status: `unblinded`

## Pre-Score Compliance Gate

| Check | Result | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case fidelity | `pass` | Artifact identity and artifact-level benchmark trace bind to `case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001`, repeat 2, the full-OfOne prompt, and the expected input-bundle hash. |
| Required outputs present | `pass` | Raw Markdown output, artifact JSON, validator JSON, rendering, patch report, and review file are present. |
| Independence from other arms/examples | `pass` | The artifact is case-native for the regulated wastewater repeat-2 slot and does not reuse another case artifact or another benchmark arm output. |
| No-superiority compliance | `pass` | The output does not claim empirical superiority. |
| Auto-reject before aggregate scoring | `no` | No pre-score gate row failed. |

## Semantic Fidelity

- Case binding: Pass; the response addresses the regulated wastewater market-entry case and keeps launch blocked by the named case unknowns.
- Copied-example risk: Low; the response is scoped to the regulated wastewater case and repeat-2 run metadata.
- Evidence provenance adequacy: Generic public EPA source identity is present, while site-specific launch evidence is kept open as unknowns.
- Artifact/source identity: Artifact, run ID, case ID, prompt hash, input-bundle hash, validator, rendering, patch report, and review file align with the repeat-2 run record.

## Scores

| Metric | Score | Rationale |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| decision_quality | 4 | Correctly recommends diligence, blocks launch, and separates launch conditions. |
| evidence_grounding_precision | 4 | Separates generic source-backed EPA evidence from unresolved site-specific evidence. |
| uncertainty_calibration | 4 | Keeps confidence medium and hidden-variable risk high. |
| trace_completeness | 4 | Links evidence, claims, unknowns, actors, criteria, option, gate, triggers, tradeoff surface, rendering, and patch path. |
| auditability | 4 | Includes case-native artifact, benchmark trace, validator JSON, rendering, patch report, and review file. |
| update_quality | 4 | Patch closure reaches rendering and gate-relevant objects. |
| cost | 2 | Full artifact and machine-output burden is much heavier than text arms. |
| inter_run_stability | NA | Repeat-2 is present, but aggregate stability scoring is deferred. |

## Required Notes

- Strongest decision-relevant contribution: It makes regulatory, technical, partner, customer, gate, and patch dependencies inspectable as decision state.
- Most important unsupported claim or missing evidence: Jurisdiction-specific permit path, influent profile, pilot-performance data, partner accountability, and customer commitment remain missing.
- Hidden variable or unknown that changed the review: The actual permit authority and influent/treatment proof can reverse launch feasibility.
- Gate, safety, or release concern: Operational launch remains blocked by the compliance/business gate.
- Patch/update behavior, if applicable: Trigger `T1` reaches evidence/unknowns, option, tradeoff surface, gate, and rendering; `T2` remains available for scoped rerun on regime or discharge-context change.
- Failure mode observed: No case-binding failure; remaining limitation is that source-backed generic EPA evidence still does not resolve jurisdiction-specific launch authority.

## Adjudication

- Accept run for aggregate scoring: `yes`
- If no, reason: N/A
- Reviewer confidence: `medium`