# Batch 01 Review

## Review Metadata

- Batch ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
- Case ID: `case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001`
- Arm ID: `full_ofone`
- Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1`
- Reviewer: local Codex unblinded review
- Review date: 2026-05-21
- Blinding status: `unblinded`

## Pre-Score Compliance Gate

| Check | Result | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case fidelity | `pass` | The raw output metadata, artifact identity, and artifact-level benchmark trace target `case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001` and the expected full-OfOne frontier run ID. |
| Required outputs present | `fail` | The required raw output package exists, including artifact JSON, computed validator JSON, rendering, and patch report, but the computed local validator rejects semantic graph checks and contradicts the model's `likely pass` self-estimate. |
| Independence from other arms/examples | `pass` | No copied-example artifact identity or other-arm dependency is visible; the failure is local semantic validity, not wrong-case reuse. |
| No-superiority compliance | `pass` | The artifact keeps `superiority_ready=false`, makes no empirical method-performance claim, and the benchmark trace explicitly says no empirical superiority claim is made. |
| Auto-reject before aggregate scoring | `yes` | Full-OfOne outputs must pass executable local validation before aggregate eligibility; this run is excluded before metric aggregation. |

## Semantic Fidelity

- Case binding: Pass; `artifact_identity.case_id`, `benchmark_trace.case_id`, and `benchmark_trace.run_id` bind to the intended regulated wastewater frontier run.
- Copied-example risk: Low; content is case-native and addresses the regulated wastewater market-entry decision rather than reusing the strategic or local agentic artifacts.
- Evidence provenance adequacy: Strong for source-backed market-entry grounding, with regulatory, permitting, reuse, residuals, PFAS, partner, customer-commitment, and compliance evidence separated from missing case-specific proof; local semantic validity still failed.
- Artifact/source identity: Raw Markdown output, conversation URL, downloaded export, artifact JSON, validator JSON, rendering, patch report, and review file all identify the same benchmark run and case.

## Scores

| Metric | Score | Rationale |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| decision_quality | 4 | The recommendation correctly distinguishes bounded diligence from operational launch and ties movement to jurisdiction, discharge path, proof, partner, and customer gates. |
| evidence_grounding_precision | 4 | The map separates public regulatory evidence, market-entry claims, unknowns, compliance gates, and update triggers with explicit source-backed reasoning. |
| uncertainty_calibration | 4 | Jurisdiction, influent, discharge or reuse path, pilot proof, residuals/PFAS, partner path, and customer commitment remain launch-blocking unknowns. |
| trace_completeness | 2 | The artifact is richly structured, but the executable validator found illegal relation endpoints and an invalid relation family. |
| auditability | 2 | The run is inspectable through raw, artifact, validator, rendering, patch, and review files, but validator failure blocks benchmark-valid audit status. |
| update_quality | 2 | Patch machinery produced an activation report for `T1`, but invalid graph semantics prevent accepting the patch closure as aggregate-valid. |
| cost | 2 | Deep Research produced stronger public-source grounding at materially higher runtime and review cost than text-only arms. |
| inter_run_stability | NA | This is the first reviewed frontier-reasoning full-OfOne repeat for this case. |

## Required Notes

- Strongest decision-relevant contribution: It creates a case-native, source-backed map that preserves the diligence-versus-launch distinction for regulated wastewater entry.
- Most important unsupported claim or missing evidence: The artifact estimates that local validation would likely pass, but the computed validator rejects multiple illegal graph relations.
- Hidden variable or unknown that changed the review: Site jurisdiction, discharge/reuse route, partner/operator path, technical proof, and local graph relation legality jointly determine whether the recommendation can move past diligence.
- Gate, safety, or release concern: Broad operational launch remains blocked; benchmark aggregate scoring is also blocked for this run.
- Patch/update behavior, if applicable: Patch artifact exists for `T1`, but invalid graph semantics prevent accepting the patch as aggregate-valid benchmark evidence.
- Failure mode observed: Frontier full-OfOne can produce a case-native detailed artifact while still encoding illegal semantic graph relations.

## Adjudication

- Accept run for aggregate scoring: `no`
- If no, reason: Computed local validation failed semantic graph checks: edges `X4`, `X5`, `X7`, `X8`, and `X9` use illegal `updates` relations from `option_move` to `unknown`; edge `X6` uses illegal `supports` from `claim` to `gate`; and edge `X13` uses invalid relation family `workflow_state` for `constrains` from `gate` to `rendering`, where the validator expects `causal`.
- Reviewer confidence: `high`

## Local Validator Adjudication

- Source: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-regulated-wastewater-market-entry-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1.validator.json`
- Decision: `reject before aggregate scoring`
- Key rule learned: Schema-valid and case-bound is not validator-valid.
- Remediation: repair the prompt/protocol or use a controlled execution path before any replacement or aggregate eligibility is accepted for this slot.