# Batch 01 Review

## Review Metadata

- Batch ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
- Case ID: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
- Arm ID: `full_ofone`
- Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__agentic_coding__r1__rerun1`
- Rerun of: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__agentic_coding__r1`
- Reviewer: local Codex unblinded review
- Review date: 2026-05-18
- Blinding status: `unblinded`

## Pre-Score Compliance Gate

| Check | Result | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case fidelity | `pass` | Artifact identity and artifact-level benchmark trace bind to `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`, the full-OfOne prompt, and the expected input-bundle hash. |
| Required outputs present | `pass` | The rerun includes raw Markdown output, artifact JSON, validator JSON, rendering, patch report, and review file. |
| Independence from other arms/examples | `pass` | The rerun is case-native and does not reuse the excluded wrong-case artifact or other benchmark arm outputs. |
| No-superiority compliance | `pass` | The output explicitly keeps superiority claims blocked and reports only this remedial run state. |
| Auto-reject before aggregate scoring | `no` | No pre-score gate row failed. |

## Semantic Fidelity

- Case binding: Pass; `artifact_identity.case_id` is `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`, and `benchmark_trace` matches the case file, prompt file, and input bundle.
- Copied-example risk: Low; the artifact content is scoped to the strategic gated diligence case and does not carry wastewater or copied-example identity.
- Evidence provenance adequacy: Adequate for this abstract benchmark case; evidence is bound to the frozen benchmark case file and marked as scenario-level.
- Artifact/source identity: Artifact, run ID, case ID, prompt hash, and input-bundle hash align with the remedial run record.

## Scores

| Metric | Score | Rationale |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| decision_quality | 4 | Correctly recommends reversible diligence while blocking operational launch. |
| evidence_grounding_precision | 4 | Separates case-file evidence from claims and records content hashes. |
| uncertainty_calibration | 4 | Keeps launch-readiness evidence as an open blocking unknown with medium confidence. |
| trace_completeness | 4 | Links evidence, claims, unknown, gate, options, tradeoff surface, trigger, and rendering. |
| auditability | 4 | Includes artifact identity, benchmark trace, validator JSON, rendering, patch report, and machine-artifact hashes. |
| update_quality | 4 | Trigger `T1` reaches the claim/gate/option/rendering path and requires rendering regeneration. |
| cost | 2 | The full artifact and review burden remains materially higher than text-only arms. |
| inter_run_stability | NA | This is the first valid full-OfOne remedial rerun for this slot, not enough evidence for stability. |

## Required Notes

- Strongest decision-relevant contribution: It repairs the failure mode by producing a case-native, benchmark-bound artifact for the exact strategic gated diligence case.
- Most important unsupported claim or missing evidence: The case remains abstract, so the artifact cannot identify concrete launch-readiness evidence beyond the required diligence output.
- Hidden variable or unknown that changed the review: `U1`, the missing launch-readiness evidence, blocks operational launch and the rendered launch recommendation.
- Gate, safety, or release concern: Gate `G1` must remain open until reviewer `A2` approves or blocks launch after diligence evidence is available.
- Patch/update behavior, if applicable: Trigger `T1` propagates new launch-readiness evidence through claims, options, gate, tradeoff surface, and rendering.
- Failure mode observed: No copied-artifact failure in this rerun; remaining limitation is scenario-level evidence only.

## Adjudication

- Accept run for aggregate scoring: `yes`
- If no, reason: N/A
- Reviewer confidence: `medium`