# Batch 01 Local Review

## Review Metadata

- Batch ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
- Case ID: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
- Arm ID: `full_ofone`
- Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__agentic_coding__r2`
- Reviewer: local Codex benchmark handoff
- Review date: 2026-05-18
- Blinding status: `unblinded`

## Pre-Score Compliance Gate

| Check | Result | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case fidelity | `pass` | Answers the strategic gated-diligence case and distinguishes diligence from launch. |
| Required outputs present | `pass` | Provides the required artifact, validation/rendering/patch companion outputs for this arm. |
| Independence from other arms/examples | `pass` | Generated from the case dossier and frozen arm prompt for repeat 2; no unsupported reuse of another case artifact. |
| No-superiority compliance | `pass` | Does not claim benchmark or method superiority. |
| Auto-reject before aggregate scoring | `no` | No pre-score gate failure. |

## Semantic Fidelity

- Case binding: pass
- Copied-example risk: low
- Evidence provenance adequacy: case-dossier evidence has stable content hashes and chain-of-custody notes
- Artifact/source identity: artifact_identity.case_id, benchmark_trace.run_id, raw output, validator, rendering, patch report, and review all identify the strategic repeat-2 run

## Scores

| Metric | Score | Rationale |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| decision_quality | 4 | Decision is specific: approve diligence only and block launch. |
| evidence_grounding_precision | 4 | Evidence objects are hashed and mapped to supported claims. |
| uncertainty_calibration | 5 | Blocking unknowns and information value entries are explicit. |
| trace_completeness | 5 | Claim, edge, option, gate, trigger, and rendering dependencies are represented. |
| auditability | 5 | Validator, rendering, patch, and review artifacts are present. |
| update_quality | 5 | Trigger closure reaches rendering and identifies revalidation requirements. |
| cost | 2 | More expensive than baselines because it emits full compiler-state artifacts. |
| inter_run_stability | 4 | Repeat-2 output remains consistent with the case's required diligence-versus-launch distinction while adding its own wording. |

## Required Notes

- Strongest decision-relevant contribution: Patchable map makes the release gate and update path addressable.
- Most important unsupported claim or missing evidence: The case still lacks real external launch criteria and reviewer identity.
- Hidden variable or unknown that changed the review: Whether the reversible diligence move creates launch-like exposure.
- Gate, safety, or release concern: G1 remains open and blocks operational launch.
- Patch/update behavior, if applicable: T1/T2 enable patch or human-review transitions through dependency closure.
- Failure mode observed: Higher artifact cost; no empirical superiority claim.

## Adjudication

- Accept run for aggregate scoring: `yes`
- If no, reason: not applicable
- Reviewer confidence: `medium`