# Batch 01 Review

## Review Metadata

- Batch ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
- Case ID: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
- Arm ID: `full_ofone`
- Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun4`
- Rerun of: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1`
- Reviewer: local Codex unblinded review
- Review date: 2026-05-21
- Blinding status: `unblinded`

## Pre-Score Compliance Gate

| Check | Result | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case fidelity | `fail` | The completed report discusses the OfOne benchmark packet generally, but it does not answer the frozen strategic gated diligence case as a full OfOne artifact package. |
| Required outputs present | `fail` | The raw export begins with `# Running an Unspecified OfOne Benchmark Packet Exactly`, not `# Benchmark Raw Output`. It contains generic package templates with placeholder `RUN-ID`, but no actual top-level run metadata, actual artifact JSON, computed validator result, case rendering, or patch report. |
| Independence from other arms/examples | `unknown` | The report is source-backed and advisory, but there is no benchmark artifact or benchmark trace that can prove arm isolation for scoring. |
| No-superiority compliance | `pass` | The report does not make an empirical superiority claim. |
| Auto-reject before aggregate scoring | `yes` | This is not a benchmark raw output package and cannot enter `remedial_runs` as a replacement or become aggregate-eligible. |

## Semantic Fidelity

- Case binding: Fail for scoring. The prose names the benchmark workflow, but no exact run header, formal status line, case-bound artifact, or artifact-level `benchmark_trace` exists.
- Copied-example risk: Unknown/low. No wrong-case artifact is visible, but there is no artifact object to validate.
- Evidence provenance adequacy: Advisory only. The export contains useful guidance about packet interpretation, source hierarchy, local validation, and packaging controls, but it is not a benchmark-submittable output.
- Artifact/source identity: The raw export is preserved and hashed, but no extracted artifact, validator output, rendering, or patch artifact exists because the required sections were absent as actual run outputs.

## Scores

| Metric | Score | Rationale |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| decision_quality | 1 | The report gives plausible process guidance, but it does not produce the requested decision artifact. |
| evidence_grounding_precision | 2 | It cites public OfOne sources, but the benchmark evidence objects are missing. |
| uncertainty_calibration | 2 | It correctly distinguishes expected validation from computed validation, but not in the required artifact form. |
| trace_completeness | 1 | No exact benchmark header, run metadata block, or artifact-level `benchmark_trace` was delivered. |
| auditability | 2 | The export and SHA are preserved, but machine-checkable artifacts are absent. |
| update_quality | 1 | No benchmark patch report or affected-closure object exists. |
| cost | 1 | The run consumed an external Deep Research pass without producing a scoreable benchmark package. |
| inter_run_stability | NA | This is a failed remedial attempt, not an aggregate-eligible repeat. |

## Required Notes

- Strongest decision-relevant contribution: It correctly identifies that benchmark validity is stricter than schema validity and that the output should be only the required package.
- Most important unsupported claim or missing evidence: The required full OfOne artifact package is missing entirely.
- Hidden variable or unknown that changed the review: Deep Research treated the attached packet as an object of research instead of executing its Prompt section as the benchmark request.
- Gate, safety, or release concern: Aggregate eligibility remains blocked for the frontier full-OfOne strategic repeat-1 slot.
- Patch/update behavior, if applicable: No patch report was produced.
- Failure mode observed: Even with a Markdown attachment and explicit "return only the required benchmark package" instruction, Deep Research can complete as a meta-analysis of the packet rather than a benchmark execution.

## Adjudication

- Accept run for aggregate scoring: `no`
- If no, reason: Completed ChatGPT Deep Research output was an advisory/meta research report, not the required benchmark raw output package; exact header, exact run metadata, and actual required sections were absent.
- Reviewer confidence: `high`

## Harvest Evidence

- Conversation: https://chatgpt.com/c/6a0ec0a2-3814-83e8-8f86-23b625eace67
- Visible completed metadata: `Research completed in 18m`; `12 citations`; `28 searches`; `21 May`; `12 sources`; report title `Running an Unspecified OfOne Benchmark Packet Exactly`.
- Downloaded source: `/Users/jamesbrady/Downloads/deep-research-report (39).md`
- Preserved raw output: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun4.md`
- Raw output SHA-256: `sha256:5d4de650a1c2f3f6612b718f45e7313f40433dfaf851afeaad1b3ca0f9dbd702`
- Local contract scan: no exact `# Benchmark Raw Output`, actual `Run ID: 2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun4`, actual `Status: completed`, actual case-bound `## Artifact JSON`, actual `## Validator Result`, actual `## Rendering`, or actual `## Patch Report` sections were present.