# Batch 01 Review

## Review Metadata

- Batch ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
- Case ID: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
- Arm ID: `full_ofone`
- Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun5`
- Reviewer: `local Codex controlled Mode A review`
- Review date: `2026-05-21`
- Blinding status: `unblinded`

## Pre-Score Compliance Gate

| Check | Result | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case fidelity | `pass` | The artifact is bound to `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`, answers the reversible-diligence-before-launch case, and keeps launch blocked behind explicit unknowns and gate `G1`. |
| Required outputs present | `pass` | Raw Markdown includes `## Artifact JSON`, `## Validator Result`, `## Rendering`, and `## Patch Report`; machine artifacts exist for artifact JSON, validator JSON, rendering, and patch JSON. |
| Independence from other arms/examples | `pass` | The controlled run used the frozen case file, full-OfOne prompt, Mode A contract, schemas, validator, renderer, and patch helper; it did not reuse prior failed artifacts or other-arm raw outputs. |
| No-superiority compliance | `pass` | The artifact and review keep `superiority_ready=false` and make no empirical superiority claim. |
| Auto-reject before aggregate scoring | `no` | No pre-score gate row failed. |

## Semantic Fidelity

- Case binding: `pass`; artifact identity and `benchmark_trace` match the case, prompt, input bundle, and rerun 5 run id.
- Copied-example risk: `low`; content is case-native and distinguishes reversible diligence from operational launch instead of copying the earlier wrong-case strategy example failure mode.
- Evidence provenance adequacy: `medium-high`; evidence is scenario-level but carries stable hashes for the case, prompt, and Mode A contract, while missing operating facts remain explicit unknowns.
- Artifact/source identity: Raw output, artifact JSON, computed validator JSON, rendering, patch report, and review all identify the same rerun 5 slot.

## Scores

| Metric | Score | Rationale |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| decision_quality | 4 | Recommendation is decision-ready: proceed with reversible diligence only; do not launch until gate and unknowns clear. It remains generic because the case is intentionally sparse. |
| evidence_grounding_precision | 4 | Claims map directly to the case/prompt/contract hashes and do not invent operating facts. |
| uncertainty_calibration | 5 | U1 and U2 explicitly block launch and rendering, with information-value entries and gate linkage. |
| trace_completeness | 5 | Artifact includes benchmark trace, source hashes, graph edges, loops, triggers, machine validator, rendering, and patch report. |
| auditability | 5 | Computed validator passed; raw package and machine artifacts are preserved separately. |
| update_quality | 4 | Trigger `T1` produces a patch transition that reaches the rendering and identifies required revalidation. |
| cost | 3 | Controlled local execution is more operator-heavy than a clean automated run, but it repairs the repeated invalid-run failure mode. |
| inter_run_stability | 3 | Stable enough for a remedial slot, but not evidence for broader model-family stability. |

## Required Notes

- Strongest decision-relevant contribution: It preserves the core distinction between reversible diligence and operational launch while making the gate and blocked unknowns machine-checkable.
- Most important unsupported claim or missing evidence: The case still lacks launch-surface details, reviewer identity, approval threshold, budget, rollback boundary, and stakeholder exposure.
- Hidden variable or unknown that changed the review: U1 and U2 block launch and keep confidence at medium.
- Gate, safety, or release concern: Gate `G1` remains open; launch remains blocked.
- Patch/update behavior, if applicable: `T1` new evidence triggers a patch that reaches the decision rendering and requires validation/rendering regeneration.
- Failure mode observed: Earlier same-shape Deep Research reruns returned meta/advisory reports or invalid artifacts; this controlled package avoids that shape failure but remains only one remedial run.

## Adjudication

- Accept run for aggregate scoring: `yes`
- If no, reason: `not applicable`
- Reviewer confidence: `medium`