# Remedial Frontier Full-OfOne Run Packet: Strategic Gated Diligence Repeat 1 Rerun 1

Prepared: `2026-05-20T22:43:13-06:00`
Batch: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
Case: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
Arm: `full_ofone`
Model family: `frontier_reasoning`
Repeat: `1`
Rerun number: `1`
Status: `rejected_invalid_output_contract`

This packet repairs the excluded frontier full-OfOne repeat-1 slot without mutating the original completed output.

Original excluded run:

`2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1`

Remedial run:

`2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1`

Use this packet only when the operator can verify a clean ChatGPT Deep Research launch: clean conversation, visible latest Pro/frontier model label, highest visible reasoning mode, Deep Research enabled, generated plan, Start or countdown, active research state, and stop-control evidence. If any launch proof is unavailable, leave this packet prepared and do not mark the remedial run complete.

## Launch Proof

- Launched: `2026-05-20T22:50:33-06:00`
- Conversation: https://chatgpt.com/c/6a0e8efd-2234-83e8-af43-a7e25266034d
- Browser surface: Computer Use on authenticated Chrome session.
- Clean-chat proof: launched from ChatGPT root/new-chat state at `chatgpt.com/` with empty composer before submission.
- Observed model/mode before launch: expanded selector showed `Latest • 5.5`; selected option showed `Pro • Extended`; composer showed `Pro`.
- Deep Research proof: composer showed `Deep research, click to remove` before submission.
- Context handoff: the benchmark packet was delivered as `Pasted text(12).txt`; visible user instruction said to use the attached pasted text as the complete Deep Research benchmark request and context, and included this remedial run ID.
- Generated plan title: `Strategic gated diligence`.
- Start action: clicked `Start` on the Deep Research plan card.
- Active proof: card shows `Researching...`; `Stop research` button is visible.

This is launch proof only. Do not harvest or mark the remedial run complete until a completed Deep Research report is visible.

## Status Updates

- `2026-05-20T22:52:32-06:00`: Run remains active in ChatGPT Deep Research. Visible status text changed to `Planning deep research and citation strategy...`; `Stop research` remains present. No completed report is visible, and no remedial output is harvested, reviewed, complete, or aggregate-eligible.
- `2026-05-20T22:54:18-06:00`: Run remains active in ChatGPT Deep Research. Visible status text changed to `Inspecting relevant docs and contracts...`; `Stop research` remains present. No completed report is visible, and no remedial output is harvested, reviewed, complete, or aggregate-eligible.
- `2026-05-20T23:11:54-06:00`: Run remains active in ChatGPT Deep Research after extended observation. Visible progress: step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Clarifying data needs and recommendations...`, count `49 searches` / `49 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present. No completed report is visible, and no remedial output is harvested, reviewed, complete, or aggregate-eligible.
- `2026-05-20T23:21:50-06:00`: Run remains active in ChatGPT Deep Research with material status progress. Visible progress remains step 1 complete and step 2 active; status text changed to `Considering frameworks and resources...`; count remains `49 searches` / `49 sources searched`; `Stop research` remains present. No completed report is visible, and no remedial output is harvested, reviewed, complete, or aggregate-eligible.
- `2026-05-20T23:26:59-06:00`: Run remains active in ChatGPT Deep Research with material status progress. Visible progress remains step 1 complete and step 2 active; status text changed to `Clarifying source review protocols...`; count remains `49 searches` / `49 sources searched`; `Stop research` remains present. No completed report is visible, and no remedial output is harvested, reviewed, complete, or aggregate-eligible.
- `2026-05-20T23:43:56-06:00`: Run remains active in ChatGPT Deep Research and unchanged past the watchdog threshold. Visible progress remains step 1 complete and step 2 active; status text remains `Clarifying source review protocols...`; count remains `49 searches` / `49 sources searched`; `Stop research` remains present. Treat as possible active-run stall evidence only; no completed report is visible, and no remedial output is harvested, reviewed, complete, or aggregate-eligible.
- `2026-05-21T00:02:00-06:00`: Run completed in ChatGPT Deep Research. Visible metadata: `Research completed in 1h 7m`, `10 citations`, `117 searches`, `20 May`, `10 sources`, title `Strategic Gated Diligence Remedial Run Research Report`. Exported Markdown source `/Users/jamesbrady/Downloads/deep-research-report (36).md` was copied to `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1.md` with SHA-256 `c0900989fe10e528648ea57d6f20f1f18f662fcff89bb04194bbc99fb5a9d385`. Contract scan found no exact `# Benchmark Raw Output`, `Run ID:`, `Status: completed`, `## Artifact JSON`, fenced JSON artifact, `## Validator Result`, `## Rendering`, or `## Patch Report` sections. The run is rejected before artifact extraction, matrix insertion, review aggregate eligibility, or any superiority comparison.

## Frozen Inputs

Case file: `benchmarks/cases/strategic-gated-diligence.md`
Case SHA-256: `sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942`

Rubric file: `benchmarks/rubrics/decision-map-rubric.md`
Rubric SHA-256: `sha256:79216de2e2805778fff27d20c9ac19a3be02a8ed24fa0b2f0f682f5e1c18ab56`

Full OfOne prompt file: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/prompts/full_ofone.md`
Full OfOne prompt SHA-256: `sha256:613afac8909b34accb57fd2c24217bb59a28a45860e32f36f6ec5f7f4ab5587e`
Full OfOne input bundle SHA-256: `sha256:4168a4e6533f1398611d704254b48c8fbfde5f547a4a0c79cd072a98fdbacd44`

## Expected Harvest Paths

- raw response: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1.md`
- extracted artifact: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1.artifact.json`
- computed local validator: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1.validator.json`
- computed local rendering: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1.rendering.md`
- computed local patch report: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1.patch.json`
- local review: `benchmarks/reviews/2026-05-17-batch-01/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1.md`

## Prompt

Paste the following into one clean ChatGPT Deep Research conversation.

````markdown
You are participating in an OfOne benchmark comparison.

Run metadata:
- Batch ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
- Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1`
- Rerun of: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1`
- Rerun reason: the original frontier full-OfOne repeat-1 artifact was case-bound but failed computed local semantic validation. This rerun repairs the excluded slot without inspecting or rewriting the original output.
- Case ID: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
- Arm: `full_ofone`
- Model family: `frontier_reasoning`
- Repeat: `1`
- Rerun number: `1`
- Actual execution order: `frontier_reasoning strategic gated diligence repeat 1 remedial full-OfOne after original full-OfOne exclusion`

Frozen input hashes:
- Case file SHA-256: `sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942`
- Prompt file SHA-256: `sha256:613afac8909b34accb57fd2c24217bb59a28a45860e32f36f6ec5f7f4ab5587e`
- Full OfOne input bundle SHA-256: `sha256:4168a4e6533f1398611d704254b48c8fbfde5f547a4a0c79cd072a98fdbacd44`
- Rubric SHA-256: `sha256:79216de2e2805778fff27d20c9ac19a3be02a8ed24fa0b2f0f682f5e1c18ab56`

Public OfOne specification surfaces:
- Repository: https://github.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain
- GitHub Pages: https://cryptojym.github.io/ofone-skillchain/
- Skill protocol: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain/main/SKILL.md
- Base schema: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain/main/schemas/ofone.base.schema.json
- Profile dispatcher schema: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain/main/schemas/ofone.schema.json
- Validation model: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain/main/docs/validation-model.md

Do not inspect outputs from any other benchmark arm. Do not inspect prior Batch 01 outputs or reviews, including the original excluded full-OfOne answer. Do not claim empirical superiority for OfOne or any method.

## Benchmark Arm Prompt: Full OfOne

Produce a full OfOne response for the case objective.

Return:

1. A schema-valid OfOne artifact JSON for the appropriate mode.
2. The validator result, including any warnings or blocked release state.
3. A human-readable rendering appropriate to the case.
4. A patch report if the case includes an update event or trigger.

Constraints:

- Preserve the distinction between evidence, claims, graph structure, criteria, option moves, gates, and rendering.
- Include source identity and explicit unknowns when evidence is missing or provisional.
- Do not treat the rendered recommendation as the internal map.
- Do not claim empirical superiority for OfOne.
- Do not inspect outputs from other benchmark arms.
- If the artifact cannot pass validation, return the artifact, diagnostics, and concrete repair plan rather than hiding the failure.
- Omit `validator_result` from the artifact unless you can truthfully say local validation has already run. The separate `## Validator Result` section should describe expected validation status only.
- `option_moves[].expected_effects` must contain existing edge IDs only, not claim IDs, unknown IDs, rendering IDs, or prose labels.
- Do not use `constrains` from an option to a claim. If an option depends on a claim or gate, use a legal relation such as `depends_on` from `option_move` to `claim` or `gate`, or use a claim/gate/criterion edge that legally constrains the option or rendering.
- Every edge relation must be legal for its endpoint types, and every loop edge reference must identify an existing edge.

The artifact must include a case-native `benchmark_trace` matching:

```json
{
  "case_id": "case-strategic-gated-diligence-001",
  "run_id": "2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1",
  "case_file": "benchmarks/cases/strategic-gated-diligence.md",
  "case_file_sha256": "sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942",
  "prompt_file": "benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/prompts/full_ofone.md",
  "prompt_file_sha256": "sha256:613afac8909b34accb57fd2c24217bb59a28a45860e32f36f6ec5f7f4ab5587e",
  "input_bundle_sha256": "sha256:4168a4e6533f1398611d704254b48c8fbfde5f547a4a0c79cd072a98fdbacd44"
}
```

## Case

A team is considering a reversible diligence move before committing to an operational launch. Produce a decision-ready answer that distinguishes what is known, what is assumed, what is blocked, what gate controls release, and what update would change the recommendation.

Domain mix:

- strategic-agentic
- normative-evaluative

Expected pressure points:

- distinction between diligence and launch
- actor/reviewer ownership
- gate status and required approval
- rendering-blocking unknowns
- patch closure from new evidence to the rendered recommendation

Begin your answer with this exact header:

# Benchmark Raw Output

Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1`
Case ID: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
Arm: `full_ofone`
Model family: `frontier_reasoning`
Repeat: `1`
Rerun of: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1`
Status: `completed`

Then provide:

1. `## Artifact JSON` with one fenced JSON block.
2. `## Validator Result` describing expected local validation status. Do not claim local validation has already run.
3. `## Rendering` with a decision-native Map rendering.
4. `## Patch Report` with affected closure for the update trigger that would change the recommendation, or a clear no-update-applicable patch report if no trigger is represented.
````

## Harvest Checklist

After completion:

1. Save raw Markdown exactly at the expected remedial raw-output path. `done`
2. Extract the artifact JSON without rewriting meaning. `rejected`: required section absent.
3. Run local validation and save computed validator JSON. `rejected`: no artifact JSON exists to validate.
4. Run local rendering and save computed rendering Markdown. `rejected`: no artifact JSON exists to render.
5. Run local patch analysis and save computed patch JSON. `rejected`: no artifact JSON exists to patch.
6. Add local review notes from the Batch 01 review template. `done`: rejected-invalid-output-contract review added.
7. Add the remedial run record to `execution-matrix.json` only after files exist and pre-score compliance passes. `blocked`: pre-score compliance failed.
8. Keep superiority claims blocked. `done`