# Remedial Frontier Full-OfOne Run Packet: Strategic Gated Diligence Repeat 1 Rerun 2

Prepared: `2026-05-21T00:12:00-06:00`
Batch: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
Case: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
Arm: `full_ofone`
Model family: `frontier_reasoning`
Repeat: `1`
Rerun number: `2`
Status: `failed`

This packet repairs the excluded frontier full-OfOne repeat-1 slot after remedial rerun 1 completed as an advisory research report instead of the required benchmark package. Do not inspect or rewrite the original excluded run, the failed rerun 1 output, other arms, prior Batch 01 outputs, or reviews. Rerun 1 is mentioned only to explain the stricter output-contract guard.

Original excluded run:

`2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1`

Failed remedial attempt:

`2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun1`

Next remedial run:

`2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2`

This packet has been launched, harvested, and rejected before aggregate scoring. Keep it as immutable failed-remedial evidence unless a later protocol explicitly supersedes this attempt.

## Launch Proof

- Status: `failed`
- Conversation: https://chatgpt.com/c/6a0ea350-3584-83e8-9d3e-ab7759c489f6
- 2026-05-21T00:17:38-06:00: Launched from a clean ChatGPT root/new-chat surface. Clean composer initially showed `Extended Pro`; after Deep Research was enabled, the composer showed `Pro`.
- Context delivery: prompt packet was delivered as `Pasted text(13).txt`; the visible instruction explicitly named remedial run `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2`.
- Deep Research proof: generated plan title `Strategic gated diligence`; `Start` clicked; visible active status `Researching...`; `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T00:25:58-06:00 observation: still active; step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Considering search options for codeload URL...`, `17 searches`, `17 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T00:29:08-06:00 observation: still active; step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Considering evidence hash computation...`, `17 searches`, `17 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T00:31:47-06:00 observation: still active; step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Inspecting example files...`, `17 searches`, `17 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T00:34:58-06:00 observation: still active; step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Looking for confidence_model shape and movement_jobs...`, `17 searches`, `17 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T00:38:27-06:00 observation: still active; step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Completing evidence and permissions setup...`, `20 searches`, `20 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T00:41:15-06:00 observation: still active; step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Streamlining evidence and claim relationships...`, `20 searches`, `20 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T00:45:04-06:00 observation: still active; step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Defining criteria and actor roles for decision-making...`, `20 searches`, `20 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T00:49:21-06:00 observation: still active; step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Citing official documentation and validation details...`, `20 searches`, `20 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T00:55:48-06:00 observation: still active; step 1 complete, step 2 active, status text `Refining duplicate detection and potential risks...`, `20 searches`, `20 sources searched`, and `Stop research` present.
- 2026-05-21T01:08:00-06:00 harvest/review: completed report visible with metadata `Research completed in 44m`, `1 citation`, `20 searches`, `21 May`, `1 source`, title `Benchmark Raw Output`, and run metadata `Status: completed`. Exported Markdown source `/Users/jamesbrady/Downloads/deep-research-report (37).md` was copied to the expected raw-output path with SHA-256 `dfdae1034abf0e0521df5103bfa297c605ac5ef149b4a3f85490f070e7179bd8`. Artifact JSON, computed validator JSON, rendering, patch report, and local review were generated. Computed local validation failed required evidence `movement_jobs` fields and a tradeoff reversal-condition defect, so this run is rejected before aggregate scoring and is not inserted into the execution matrix.

## Frozen Inputs

Case file: `benchmarks/cases/strategic-gated-diligence.md`
Case SHA-256: `sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942`

Rubric file: `benchmarks/rubrics/decision-map-rubric.md`
Rubric SHA-256: `sha256:79216de2e2805778fff27d20c9ac19a3be02a8ed24fa0b2f0f682f5e1c18ab56`

Full OfOne prompt file: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/prompts/full_ofone.md`
Full OfOne prompt SHA-256: `sha256:613afac8909b34accb57fd2c24217bb59a28a45860e32f36f6ec5f7f4ab5587e`
Full OfOne input bundle SHA-256: `sha256:4168a4e6533f1398611d704254b48c8fbfde5f547a4a0c79cd072a98fdbacd44`

## Expected Harvest Paths

- raw response: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2.md`
- extracted artifact: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2.artifact.json`
- computed local validator: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2.validator.json`
- computed local rendering: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2.rendering.md`
- computed local patch report: `benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/outputs/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2.patch.json`
- local review: `benchmarks/reviews/2026-05-17-batch-01/2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2.md`

## Prompt

Paste the following into one clean ChatGPT Deep Research conversation.

````markdown
You are participating in an OfOne benchmark comparison.

Critical output-contract rule:

- Do not produce a research report, advisory memo, workplan, literature review, implementation plan, checklist-only answer, or template-only answer.
- Use Deep Research internally if needed, but the final answer is invalid unless the first line is exactly `# Benchmark Raw Output`.
- The final answer must be the benchmark package itself.
- The final answer must include actual content under all four required sections: `## Artifact JSON`, `## Validator Result`, `## Rendering`, and `## Patch Report`.
- If you cannot complete the artifact, still return `# Benchmark Raw Output` and include a best-effort artifact plus diagnostics. Do not switch to a research report.

Run metadata:
- Batch ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01`
- Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2`
- Rerun of: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1`
- Rerun reason: the original frontier full-OfOne repeat-1 artifact was case-bound but failed computed local semantic validation; remedial rerun 1 completed as an advisory research report and is not benchmark-valid. This rerun repairs the excluded slot without inspecting or rewriting the original output or failed rerun output.
- Case ID: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
- Arm: `full_ofone`
- Model family: `frontier_reasoning`
- Repeat: `1`
- Rerun number: `2`
- Actual execution order: `frontier_reasoning strategic gated diligence repeat 1 remedial full-OfOne after original exclusion and failed output-contract rerun`

Frozen input hashes:
- Case file SHA-256: `sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942`
- Prompt file SHA-256: `sha256:613afac8909b34accb57fd2c24217bb59a28a45860e32f36f6ec5f7f4ab5587e`
- Full OfOne input bundle SHA-256: `sha256:4168a4e6533f1398611d704254b48c8fbfde5f547a4a0c79cd072a98fdbacd44`
- Rubric SHA-256: `sha256:79216de2e2805778fff27d20c9ac19a3be02a8ed24fa0b2f0f682f5e1c18ab56`

Allowed public OfOne specification surfaces:
- Repository root: https://github.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain
- GitHub Pages root: https://cryptojym.github.io/ofone-skillchain/
- Skill protocol: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain/main/SKILL.md
- Base schema: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain/main/schemas/ofone.base.schema.json
- Profile dispatcher schema: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain/main/schemas/ofone.schema.json
- Validation model: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CryptoJym/ofone-skillchain/main/docs/validation-model.md

Forbidden surfaces:
- Do not inspect outputs from any other benchmark arm.
- Do not inspect prior Batch 01 outputs or reviews.
- Do not inspect the original excluded full-OfOne answer.
- Do not inspect the failed remedial rerun 1 output or review.
- Do not claim empirical superiority for OfOne or any method.

## Benchmark Arm Prompt: Full OfOne

Produce a full OfOne response for the case objective.

Return:

1. A schema-valid OfOne artifact JSON for the appropriate mode.
2. The validator result, including any warnings or blocked release state.
3. A human-readable rendering appropriate to the case.
4. A patch report if the case includes an update event or trigger.

Constraints:

- Preserve the distinction between evidence, claims, graph structure, criteria, option moves, gates, and rendering.
- Include source identity and explicit unknowns when evidence is missing or provisional.
- Do not treat the rendered recommendation as the internal map.
- Do not claim empirical superiority for OfOne.
- Do not inspect outputs from other benchmark arms.
- If the artifact cannot pass validation, return the artifact, diagnostics, and concrete repair plan rather than hiding the failure.
- Omit `validator_result` from the artifact unless you can truthfully say local validation has already run. The separate `## Validator Result` section should describe expected validation status only.
- `option_moves[].expected_effects` must contain existing edge IDs only, not claim IDs, unknown IDs, rendering IDs, or prose labels.
- Do not use `constrains` from an option to a claim. If an option depends on a claim or gate, use a legal relation such as `depends_on` from `option_move` to `claim` or `gate`, or use a claim/gate/criterion edge that legally constrains the option or rendering.
- Every edge relation must be legal for its endpoint types, and every loop edge reference must identify an existing edge.

The artifact must include a case-native `benchmark_trace` matching:

```json
{
  "case_id": "case-strategic-gated-diligence-001",
  "run_id": "2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2",
  "case_file": "benchmarks/cases/strategic-gated-diligence.md",
  "case_file_sha256": "sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942",
  "prompt_file": "benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/prompts/full_ofone.md",
  "prompt_file_sha256": "sha256:613afac8909b34accb57fd2c24217bb59a28a45860e32f36f6ec5f7f4ab5587e",
  "input_bundle_sha256": "sha256:4168a4e6533f1398611d704254b48c8fbfde5f547a4a0c79cd072a98fdbacd44"
}
```

## Case

A team is considering a reversible diligence move before committing to an operational launch. Produce a decision-ready answer that distinguishes what is known, what is assumed, what is blocked, what gate controls release, and what update would change the recommendation.

Domain mix:

- strategic-agentic
- normative-evaluative

Expected pressure points:

- distinction between diligence and launch
- actor/reviewer ownership
- gate status and required approval
- rendering-blocking unknowns
- patch closure from new evidence to the rendered recommendation

Begin your answer with this exact header and metadata:

# Benchmark Raw Output

Run ID: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun2`
Case ID: `case-strategic-gated-diligence-001`
Arm: `full_ofone`
Model family: `frontier_reasoning`
Repeat: `1`
Rerun of: `2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1`
Status: `completed`

Then provide:

## Artifact JSON

One fenced `json` block containing the full OfOne artifact. This section must not be empty.

## Validator Result

Expected local validation status and diagnostics. Do not claim local validation has already run.

## Rendering

A decision-native Map rendering.

## Patch Report

Affected closure for the update trigger that would change the recommendation, or a clear no-update-applicable patch report if no trigger is represented.
````

## Harvest Checklist

After completion:

1. Save raw Markdown exactly at the expected remedial raw-output path.
2. Confirm the first line is exactly `# Benchmark Raw Output`.
3. Confirm the raw output includes exact run metadata and `Status: completed`.
4. Confirm all four required sections exist with actual content.
5. Extract the artifact JSON without rewriting meaning.
6. Run local validation and save computed validator JSON.
7. Run local rendering and save computed rendering Markdown.
8. Run local patch analysis and save computed patch JSON.
9. Add local review notes from the Batch 01 review template.
10. Add the remedial run record to `execution-matrix.json` only after files exist and pre-score compliance passes.
11. Keep superiority claims blocked.