# Benchmark Raw Output `Model Family:` GPT-5.2 Thinking `Actual Model:` OpenAI GPT-5.2 Thinking `Reasoning Effort:` high `Date:` 2026-05-21 `Status:` completed ## Artifact JSON ```json { "ofone_version": "0.6.0", "mode": "Map", "charter": { "objective": "Decide whether a team should take a reversible diligence move before committing to an operational launch in the bounded benchmark case.", "scope": [ "benchmark case only", "distinction between diligence and launch", "gate-controlled release", "update-driven patch closure" ], "horizon": "current decision cycle before any operational launch commitment", "stakes": [ "premature commitment risk", "review failure risk", "decision quality under missing evidence", "false equivalence between diligence and launch" ], "risk_tier": "medium", "movement_jobs": [ "BOUND", "GATE" ] }, "adapter_projection": { "primary": "hybrid", "axes": { "strategic-agentic": [ "reversible diligence", "operational launch commitment", "decision leverage under uncertainty" ], "normative-evaluative": [ "reviewer legitimacy", "approval before release", "avoid false authorization" ] }, "movement_jobs": [ "BOUND", "LINK" ] }, "scene": { "scene_id": "S1", "frames": [ { "frame_id": "F1", "type": "strategic", "assumptions": [ "The case requires a choice between staying in diligence mode and committing to launch." ] }, { "frame_id": "F2", "type": "normative", "assumptions": [ "Reviewer approval is required before release moves beyond diligence mode." ] }, { "frame_id": "F3", "type": "evidential", "assumptions": [ "The packet supplies bounded scenario evidence rather than concrete operational launch facts." ] } ], "tokens": [ { "token_id": "K1", "kind": "entity", "label": "team considering the move" }, { "token_id": "K2", "kind": "option", "label": "reversible diligence move" }, { "token_id": "K3", "kind": "option", "label": "operational launch commitment" }, { "token_id": "K4", "kind": "gate", "label": "release gate G1" }, { "token_id": "K5", "kind": "variable", "label": "concrete launch-readiness evidence" }, { "token_id": "K6", "kind": "unknown", "label": "unresolved launch-readiness state" } ], "subscenes": [ { "subscene_id": "SS1", "parent_scene": "S1", "purpose": "option_decision", "frames": [ "F1", "F3" ], "tokens": [ "K2", "K3", "K5", "K6" ], "entry_conditions": [ "The case asks for a decision-ready distinction between diligence and launch." ], "exit_conditions": [ "One option dominates and the blocked state is explicit." ], "movement_jobs": [ "BOUND", "EVALUATE" ] }, { "subscene_id": "SS2", "parent_scene": "S1", "purpose": "evidence_acquisition", "frames": [ "F3" ], "tokens": [ "K5", "K6" ], "entry_conditions": [ "Concrete launch-readiness evidence is not supplied in the packet." ], "exit_conditions": [ "U1 is resolved or explicitly accepted as a risk." ], "movement_jobs": [ "GROUND", "TEST" ] }, { "subscene_id": "SS3", "parent_scene": "S1", "purpose": "review_gate", "frames": [ "F2" ], "tokens": [ "K4", "K6" ], "entry_conditions": [ "A release decision could move beyond diligence mode." ], "exit_conditions": [ "G1 is approved or remains open with launch blocked." ], "movement_jobs": [ "GATE", "WARN" ] } ], "state_variables": [ "decision posture", "launch commitment status", "gate status" ], "observed_variables": [ "case objective", "case pressure points", "presence of a blocking unknown" ], "hidden_variables": [ "real launch-readiness facts outside the packet", "reviewer approval threshold under concrete evidence", "time and cost of resolving U1" ], "movement_jobs": [ "BOUND", "LINK" ] }, "evidence": [ { "evidence_id": "E1", "source": "file", "span_or_locator": "benchmarks/cases/strategic-gated-diligence.md#case", "provenance": "frozen benchmark case dossier", "recency": "current", "reliability": "medium", "permission": "public", "content_hash": "sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942", "retrieved_at": "2026-05-21T00:00:00Z", "extract": "A team is considering a reversible diligence move before committing to an operational launch.", "source_owner": "OfOne benchmark suite", "chain_of_custody": "read from the frozen benchmark case supplied in the packet", "supports": [ "C1", "C2", "C3" ], "risks": [ "scenario_level_only" ], "movement_jobs": [ "GROUND", "BOUND" ] }, { "evidence_id": "E2", "source": "file", "span_or_locator": "benchmarks/cases/strategic-gated-diligence.md#pressure-points", "provenance": "frozen benchmark case dossier", "recency": "current", "reliability": "medium", "permission": "public", "content_hash": "sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942", "retrieved_at": "2026-05-21T00:00:00Z", "extract": "Expected pressure points include distinguishing diligence from launch, actor/reviewer ownership, gate status and required approval, rendering-blocking unknowns, and patch closure from new evidence.", "source_owner": "OfOne benchmark suite", "chain_of_custody": "read from the frozen benchmark case supplied in the packet", "supports": [ "C1", "C2", "C4" ], "risks": [ "scenario_level_only" ], "movement_jobs": [ "GROUND", "BOUND", "GATE" ] }, { "evidence_id": "E3", "source": "file", "span_or_locator": "benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/prompts/full_ofone.md#full-ofone-case", "provenance": "frozen benchmark arm prompt", "recency": "current", "reliability": "medium", "permission": "public", "content_hash": "sha256:613afac8909b34accb57fd2c24217bb59a28a45860e32f36f6ec5f7f4ab5587e", "retrieved_at": "2026-05-21T00:00:00Z", "extract": "For this case, define at least one blocking unknown U1 and one update trigger T1, use reversal_conditions ['U1', 'T1'], represent gate G1, and keep G1 out of reversal_conditions.", "source_owner": "OfOne benchmark suite", "chain_of_custody": "read from the frozen benchmark packet supplied in the prompt", "supports": [ "C2", "C4" ], "risks": [ "benchmark_scaffold_constraint" ], "movement_jobs": [ "GROUND", "BOUND", "GATE" ] } ], "claims": [ { "claim_id": "C1", "text": "The bounded decision is whether to take a reversible diligence step before launch, not whether to authorize launch now.", "type": "operational", "supports": [ "E1", "E2" ], "contradicts": [], "depends_on": [], "confidence": { "level": "high", "basis": [ "provenance", "recency", "adapter_fit" ], "failure_modes": [ "case-specific facts are intentionally sparse" ] }, "status": "active", "review_gate": true, "movement_jobs": [ "CLAIM", "BOUND", "GATE" ] }, { "claim_id": "C2", "text": "Operational launch is not supported by the current packet because concrete launch-readiness evidence is missing and the case explicitly expects a blocking unknown and a release gate.", "type": "operational", "supports": [ "E1", "E2", "E3" ], "contradicts": [], "depends_on": [ "C1" ], "confidence": { "level": "medium", "basis": [ "provenance", "hidden_variable_risk", "adapter_fit" ], "failure_modes": [ "new packet evidence could resolve launch readiness", "reviewer could accept risk under additional facts" ] }, "status": "active", "review_gate": true, "movement_jobs": [ "CLAIM", "WARN", "GATE" ] }, { "claim_id": "C3", "text": "A reversible diligence move is the dominant near-term option because it preserves reversibility while gathering decision-relevant evidence.", "type": "normative", "supports": [ "E1", "E2" ], "contradicts": [], "depends_on": [ "C1", "C2" ], "confidence": { "level": "medium", "basis": [ "provenance", "mechanism_fit", "adapter_fit" ], "failure_modes": [ "a concrete launch authorization packet could reverse the option ranking", "the diligence step could prove non-reversible in a later update" ] }, "status": "active", "review_gate": true, "movement_jobs": [ "CLAIM", "EVALUATE", "MOVE" ] }, { "claim_id": "C4", "text": "Gate G1 must remain open until a human reviewer approves any movement beyond diligence mode after U1 is resolved or accepted as risk.", "type": "operational", "supports": [ "E2", "E3" ], "contradicts": [], "depends_on": [ "C2" ], "confidence": { "level": "medium", "basis": [ "provenance", "adapter_fit", "contradiction_load" ], "failure_modes": [ "review role ambiguity", "gate bypass outside the mapped process" ] }, "status": "active", "review_gate": true, "movement_jobs": [ "CLAIM", "GATE", "LINK" ] } ], "unknowns": [ { "unknown_id": "U1", "kind": "missing_evidence", "description": "The packet does not provide concrete launch-readiness evidence, reviewer-approved approval thresholds, or closure criteria showing that launch is authorized now.", "blocks": [ "O2", "R1", "G1" ], "resolution_move": "Collect concrete launch-readiness facts, define the approval threshold, and submit them for G1 review before any launch commitment.", "status": "open", "movement_jobs": [ "WARN", "GATE", "TEST" ] } ], "kill_tests": [ { "test_id": "KT1", "target": "C3", "test_type": "counterexample", "condition": "A packet update shows that launch is already authorized with concrete evidence and no additional diligence is needed.", "falsifies": [ "C3" ], "movement_jobs": [ "TEST", "WARN" ] }, { "test_id": "KT2", "target": "C4", "test_type": "adapter_conflict", "condition": "A packet update removes reviewer ownership or shows that no human gate governs release past diligence mode.", "falsifies": [ "C4" ], "movement_jobs": [ "TEST", "WARN" ] } ], "criteria": [ { "criterion_id": "CR1", "name": "Preserve reversibility before commitment", "kind": "threshold", "priority": "must", "threshold": "Do not collapse a diligence move into an operational launch commitment.", "owned_by": [ "A1", "A2" ], "movement_jobs": [ "EVALUATE", "GATE" ] }, { "criterion_id": "CR2", "name": "Resolve the highest-value launch unknown", "kind": "objective", "priority": "should", "threshold": "Reduce U1 enough to distinguish diligence completion from launch authorization.", "owned_by": [ "A2" ], "movement_jobs": [ "EVALUATE", "MOVE" ] }, { "criterion_id": "CR3", "name": "Require explicit human release approval", "kind": "threshold", "priority": "must", "threshold": "No movement beyond diligence mode without explicit G1 approval.", "owned_by": [ "A1" ], "movement_jobs": [ "EVALUATE", "GATE" ] } ], "tradeoff_surface": { "surface_id": "TS1", "options": [ "O1", "O2" ], "criteria": [ "CR1", "CR2", "CR3" ], "dominant_option": "O1", "why": [ "CR1", "CR2", "CR3" ], "reversal_conditions": [ "U1", "T1" ], "movement_jobs": [ "EVALUATE", "TRIGGER" ] }, "actors": [ { "actor_id": "A1", "label": "human review owner", "role": "reviewer", "incentives": [ "prevent false release", "keep launch approval case-bound" ], "exposures": [ "operational risk", "reputation risk", "review failure risk" ], "authority": "approve", "legitimacy_basis": "The case explicitly makes reviewer ownership and required approval decision-relevant.", "movement_jobs": [ "BOUND", "WARN", "GATE" ] }, { "actor_id": "A2", "label": "team decision owner", "role": "decision_owner", "incentives": [ "learn quickly", "preserve optionality", "avoid premature commitment" ], "exposures": [ "time cost", "opportunity cost", "launch error" ], "authority": "advise", "legitimacy_basis": "Owns the operational decision subject to the reviewer gate.", "movement_jobs": [ "BOUND", "MOVE", "EVALUATE" ] } ], "temporal_model": { "time_horizon": "current decision cycle", "decision_deadline": "before any operational launch commitment", "evidence_validity_windows": [ { "evidence_id": "E1", "valid_until": "unknown", "staleness_trigger": "the case packet changes or new evidence revises the bounded scenario" }, { "evidence_id": "E2", "valid_until": "unknown", "staleness_trigger": "the case packet changes or review expectations are updated" }, { "evidence_id": "E3", "valid_until": "unknown", "staleness_trigger": "the benchmark packet or rerun constraints change" } ], "update_cadence": "on every new packet update or reviewer escalation", "movement_jobs": [ "BOUND", "TRIGGER", "WARN" ] }, "information_value": [ { "unknown_id": "U1", "decision_impact": "high", "resolution_cost": "medium", "time_to_resolve": "one review cycle", "risk_reduction": "high", "recommended_next_query": "What concrete evidence, approval threshold, and owner-signed conditions would separate diligence completion from launch authorization in this packet?", "movement_jobs": [ "TEST", "MOVE", "EVALUATE" ] } ], "lenses": [ { "lens_id": "LENS1", "name": "strategic agentic lens", "adapter_axis": "strategic-agentic", "questions": [ "Does the current move preserve optionality and avoid premature commitment?" ], "claims_examined": [ "C1", "C3" ], "blind_spots": [ "The packet does not quantify schedule, cost, or operational upside for either option." ], "contention": [ "Immediate launch collapses the distinction between diligence and commitment." ], "movement_jobs": [ "WARN", "TEST", "EVALUATE" ] }, { "lens_id": "LENS2", "name": "normative evaluative lens", "adapter_axis": "normative-evaluative", "questions": [ "Would it be legitimate to treat the current packet as authorization to launch?" ], "claims_examined": [ "C2", "C4" ], "blind_spots": [ "The packet does not enumerate concrete affected-party harms beyond the bounded scenario." ], "contention": [ "A release gate must stay explicit while U1 remains open." ], "movement_jobs": [ "WARN", "TEST", "EVALUATE" ] } ], "council_result": { "coverage": [ "strategic-agentic", "normative-evaluative" ], "missing_lenses": [], "major_dissent": [ "No evidence in the packet supports immediate launch authorization." ], "decision_effect": "Recommend reversible diligence only; keep operational launch blocked until U1 is resolved and G1 is approved.", "movement_jobs": [ "EVALUATE", "WARN", "GATE" ] }, "edges": [ { "edge_id": "X1", "from": "C1", "to": "C2", "relation_family": "argumentative", "relation": "supports", "evidence_refs": [ "E1", "E2" ], "confidence": "high", "movement_jobs": [ "LINK" ] }, { "edge_id": "X2", "from": "K2", "to": "C3", "relation_family": "causal", "relation": "enables", "evidence_refs": [ "E1", "E2" ], "confidence": "medium", "movement_jobs": [ "LINK", "MOVE" ] }, { "edge_id": "X3", "from": "K5", "to": "C2", "relation_family": "causal", "relation": "constrains", "evidence_refs": [ "E2", "E3" ], "confidence": "medium", "movement_jobs": [ "LINK", "WARN" ] }, { "edge_id": "X4", "from": "K4", "to": "C4", "relation_family": "causal", "relation": "constrains", "evidence_refs": [ "E2", "E3" ], "confidence": "high", "movement_jobs": [ "LINK", "GATE" ] }, { "edge_id": "X5", "from": "C2", "to": "C3", "relation_family": "argumentative", "relation": "supports", "evidence_refs": [ "E1", "E2", "E3" ], "confidence": "medium", "movement_jobs": [ "LINK", "EVALUATE" ] }, { "edge_id": "X6", "from": "G1", "to": "R1", "relation_family": "workflow_state", "relation": "blocks", "evidence_refs": [ "E2", "E3" ], "confidence": "high", "movement_jobs": [ "LINK", "GATE" ] }, { "edge_id": "X7", "from": "O1", "to": "G1", "relation_family": "workflow_state", "relation": "depends_on", "evidence_refs": [ "E2", "E3" ], "confidence": "high", "movement_jobs": [ "LINK", "GATE" ] }, { "edge_id": "X8", "from": "O2", "to": "G1", "relation_family": "workflow_state", "relation": "depends_on", "evidence_refs": [ "E2", "E3" ], "confidence": "high", "movement_jobs": [ "LINK", "GATE" ] } ], "loops": [ { "loop_id": "L1", "type": "review", "edges": [ "X3", "X6", "X8" ], "polarity": "balancing", "delay": "medium", "gain": "high", "control_points": [ "resolve U1", "review G1", "update the rendering only after the gate decision" ], "observable_cues": [ "launch remains blocked while U1 is open", "new evidence changes the gate discussion before changing the recommendation" ], "failure_mode": "The team mistakes a diligence recommendation for launch approval and skips the human gate.", "movement_jobs": [ "WARN", "GATE", "TRIGGER" ] } ], "option_moves": [ { "option_id": "O1", "move_type": "query", "preconditions": [ "C1", "C2" ], "expected_effects": [ "X2", "X5", "X7" ], "tradeoffs": [ "slower commitment", "more evidence work", "preserved reversibility" ], "blocking_unknowns": [], "review_gate": "G1", "movement_jobs": [ "MOVE", "EVALUATE", "GATE" ] }, { "option_id": "O2", "move_type": "act", "preconditions": [ "C1", "C4" ], "expected_effects": [ "X3", "X6", "X8" ], "tradeoffs": [ "faster action", "higher false-release risk", "lower reversibility" ], "blocking_unknowns": [ "U1" ], "review_gate": "G1", "movement_jobs": [ "MOVE", "WARN", "GATE" ] } ], "triggers": [ { "trigger_id": "T1", "condition": "new_evidence", "affected_objects": [ "U1", "O2", "TS1", "G1", "R1" ], "transition": "patch", "movement_jobs": [ "TRIGGER", "WARN" ] }, { "trigger_id": "T2", "condition": "review_required", "affected_objects": [ "G1", "R1" ], "transition": "human_review", "movement_jobs": [ "TRIGGER", "GATE" ] } ], "gates": [ { "gate_id": "G1", "condition": "any move that would treat diligence as launch authorization or release the decision beyond diligence mode", "reviewer": "A1 human review owner", "required_decision": "approve diligence-only continuation, keep launch blocked, or approve launch after U1 closure", "status": "open", "movement_jobs": [ "GATE", "WARN" ] } ], "confidence_model": { "overall": "medium", "provenance_strength": "high", "source_independence": "low", "recency": "high", "mechanism_fit": "medium", "contradiction_load": "low", "hidden_variable_risk": "high", "adversarial_risk": "low", "adapter_fit": "high", "movement_jobs": [ "EVALUATE", "WARN" ] }, "decision_rendering": { "rendering_id": "R1", "summary": "The packet supports a diligence-only posture, but concrete launch-readiness evidence and approval thresholds are still missing, so launch remains blocked behind G1.", "recommendation": "Proceed with the reversible diligence move O1 only. Do not commit to operational launch O2 until U1 is resolved and G1 is explicitly approved.", "confidence": "medium", "depends_on": [ "C1", "C2", "C3", "C4", "O1", "U1", "TS1", "G1" ], "movement_jobs": [ "EVALUATE", "MOVE", "GATE" ] }, "artifact_identity": { "artifact_id": "OFONE-2026-05-21-case-strategic-gated-diligence-001-rerun3", "case_id": "case-strategic-gated-diligence-001", "objective_head": "reversible diligence before operational launch", "scope_hash": "unknown", "config_hash": "unknown", "active_evidence_hashes": [ "sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942", "sha256:613afac8909b34accb57fd2c24217bb59a28a45860e32f36f6ec5f7f4ab5587e" ], "created_at": "2026-05-21T00:00:00Z", "status": "review_pending", "movement_jobs": [ "BOUND", "TRIGGER" ] }, "review_log": [], "benchmark_trace": { "case_id": "case-strategic-gated-diligence-001", "run_id": "2026-05-17-batch-01__case-strategic-gated-diligence-001__full_ofone__frontier_reasoning__r1__rerun3", "case_file": "benchmarks/cases/strategic-gated-diligence.md", "case_file_sha256": "sha256:18a0247003e142c80c8748eb4652f900b81ca409b91ba7c370e1362d24680942", "prompt_file": "benchmarks/runs/2026-05-17-batch-01/prompts/full_ofone.md", "prompt_file_sha256": "sha256:613afac8909b34accb57fd2c24217bb59a28a45860e32f36f6ec5f7f4ab5587e", "input_bundle_sha256": "sha256:4168a4e6533f1398611d704254b48c8fbfde5f547a4a0c79cd072a98fdbacd44", "movement_jobs": [ "GROUND", "BOUND" ] } } ``` ## Validator Result This artifact is intentionally shaped as a current `Map` artifact with the repo’s extended base objects: `charter`, `artifact_identity`, `adapter_projection`, `scene` with `subscenes`, evidence objects with provenance and hashes, typed claims and unknowns, criteria and `tradeoff_surface`, actors and temporal state, legal `edges` and `loops`, `option_moves`, `triggers`, `gates`, `confidence_model`, and `decision_rendering`. The packet also explicitly requires the rerun3 benchmark identity and says not to include `validator_result` inside the artifact unless a real local validation run has written it back. fileciteturn0file0 citeturn14view0turn13view0turn13view2turn37view2 Expected status, if run against the current validator, is **likely schema-pass with open review state**, not released state. The strongest reasons are that the artifact follows the active `Map` profile surfaces, uses the current gate and rendering structure visible in the official source-backed example, includes non-empty `movement_jobs` on the high-salience objects the semantic validator checks, gives `tradeoff_surface.reversal_conditions` as `["U1","T1"]`, keeps `G1` in `gates` rather than in `reversal_conditions`, and makes `decision_rendering.depends_on` include `TS1`. citeturn14view0turn13view2turn36view4turn37view1turn37view2 The primary uncertainty is **benchmark-trace shape drift versus validator build**. Public validation docs say benchmark workflow validation is stricter than ordinary artifact validation and that `benchmark_trace` binds the artifact to the frozen case file, prompt file, and input bundle hashes, while the local validator is the source of truth. Because no local validator was run here, the truthful status is “artifact authored to likely pass; release still blocked by open gate and unresolved unknown.” citeturn13view0turn13view3turn24view0 Semantically, release should remain blocked: `U1` is open, `G1` is open, `O2` is explicitly blocked by `U1`, and the rendering recommends `O1` only. That is consistent with the official example’s open-gate pattern and with the validation model’s checks for unknown blocking, option review gates, rendering dependencies, actor ownership, and gate/release validation. citeturn37view1turn37view2turn38view1turn13view2 ## Rendering The known state is narrow and explicit: the bounded case asks whether to take a **reversible diligence** step before an **operational launch**, and the packet makes the distinction between those two states, reviewer ownership, gate status, blocking unknowns, and patch closure part of the evaluation itself. fileciteturn0file0 citeturn24view0turn37view0 Current rendering: **choose O1, not O2**. The map’s dominant option is reversible diligence because it preserves reversibility, directly targets the highest-value missing evidence, and does not treat the current bounded packet as sufficient launch authorization. Confidence is **medium** because the packet is structurally informative but still scenario-level, with high hidden-variable risk and a still-open release gate. citeturn36view4turn37view1turn37view2turn13view2 What would change the recommendation is not generic confidence drift but a typed closure event: **T1 new evidence** that resolves `U1`, followed by **G1 approval**. If that happens, the affected closure can be patched and `TS1` can be recomputed without a full trunk rewrite; if `U1` stays open, the launch-blocked rendering should stay in place. citeturn24view0turn13view2turn13view3 ## Patch Report Patch trigger: **T1 = `new_evidence`** on `U1`. Minimal affected closure is: new evidence object(s) → `U1` → claims materially dependent on the missing launch-readiness state, especially `C2` and `C4` → graph edges that express constraint/gate state (`X3`, `X6`, `X8`) and the support chain into option ranking (`X5`) → option comparison at `TS1` → gate `G1` → rendering `R1`. This is the dependency-closure behavior the official validation model describes, and it matches the public “render, patch, benchmark” operating loop. citeturn13view0turn13view2turn24view0 If a future packet update only narrows `U1` but does **not** resolve it, the patch should update evidence provenance, confidence, and rationale while preserving the diligence-only recommendation. If the update resolves `U1` and the reviewer explicitly approves `G1`, then the patch may legally recompute `TS1` and `R1`; only at that point could the dominant option shift away from `O1`. citeturn13view2turn13view3turn37view1turn37view2